Why Intelligent People Prefer To Socialize Less

If you’re a relatively intelligent person, two things are likely true: you socialize less than your peers, and you have anxiety about whether or not that’s normal and sane and acceptable. As most of us already know, intelligent people tend to be more anxious than others and also are more likely to have social anxiety, as they are more perceptive than the average person. However, a study published in the British Journal of Psychology has demonstrated that this often goes even a step further: highly intelligent people actually prefer their own company, and there’s a pretty interesting reason why.

First, what we know: the study explained that evolutionary psychologists have discovered a link between frequent social interaction and reduced life satisfaction in people who are generally more intelligent. They surveyed adults between the ages of 18 and 28, and found that people who lived in more densely populated areas reported lower levels of happiness, and the same was true when people had more frequent socialization with friends.

Asian Chinese woman cutting birthday cake with her LGBTQ friends outdoor dining celebration

The study proposes the idea that “savannah theory” is at the root of modern happiness — or that the things that inherently make us happy are as true now as they were at the dawn of civilization. The idea is that smarter individuals are better able to adapt to the challenges of modern living, and are more willing to “leave the group” to forge ahead with their own, more fulfilling lives. Basically: intelligent people prefer to socialize less because they do not need that feeling of tribal belonging to find meaning in their lives. In fact, they’re the ones who, when confronted with the choice between “belonging” and forging their own path, are more likely to choose to go their own way.

So according to this theory, our hunter-gatherer brains were perfectly adapted to life as it was back then, where the population would have been smaller, and we would have existed in groups of around 150 people each. Social interaction would have been crucial to survive. It is that ability to adapt that marks an intelligent person. In the past, a superior human would have been able to follow their instincts best — today, a superior human is best able to forge their own future as opposed to just adhere to the group.

Related Posts

Taylor Swift’s fans left disgusted.

Even when you’re on a whirlwind global tour, the show must go on—even if you’re battling a cold. This weekend, Taylor Swift’s dedication to her fans was…

Mel Gibson proposed a ‘crazy’ conspiracy theory about the LA wildfires after his home was destroyed, which left many baffled

Actor Mel Gibson has presented his own theory regarding the LA wildfires, and it left many baffled. The Mad Max star lost his £12million Malibu home in…

Jase and Missy Robertson’s Journey: Overcoming Obstacles and Finding Strength

Jase and Missy Robertson of Duck Dynasty have inspired fans with their resilience. After suffering a heartbreaking miscarriage in 2002, the couple found hope when they welcomed…

Singer Makes It Clear She Is “Not Making Music For White People”

In her frank interview with Vanity Fair, Lizzo categorically denied that her music is intended for a “white audience.” Rather, the 34-year-old musician writes songs that reflect…

Why Kay’Ana Adams Was Fired for a Tattoo: Her Story Revealed

Tattoos often spark debates about personal expression and professionalism. For Kay’Ana Adams, a firefighter in Alabama, her tattoo became the center of a workplace controversy that ultimately…

All eyes were on Melania Trump at Jimmy Carter’s funeral

Many current and former U.S. leaders attended Jimmy Carter’s funeral yesterday, including Donald and Melania Trump. While Donald appeared composed, Melania’s visibly upset expression drew significant attention…