Trump’s Revocation of Key Employment Protections Ignites Intense Debate Over Worker Impact
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term as the 47th
President of the United States in a ceremony marked by tradition, grandeur, and a flurry of
executive actions aimed at shaping his administration’s priorities. Among the 25 executive orders
signed that day, one particularly controversial decision stood out: the revocation of Executive Order 11246.
This move has ignited a heated debate across political lines, raising questions about its
implications for workers and the broader landscape of workplace equity.
The Controversial Executive Order: Revoking DEI Programs
Executive Order 11246, established in 1965, has long been a foundational policy aimed at preventing
discrimination in federal employment and ensuring equal opportunity for all workers. It prohibits
discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or
national origin and requires federal contractors to implement affirmative action plans to
promote diversity and inclusion in their workplaces. Essentially, this order has been a cornerstone
in the fight against workplace discrimination, fostering an environment where underrepresented groups
can thrive and achieve equal footing with their peers.
President Trump’s decision to revoke this executive order on January 21, just a day after his inauguration,
marks a significant shift in federal policy. The new executive order explicitly dismantles diversity,
equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within government agencies, signaling a clear departure from
decades of efforts to promote workplace fairness and inclusivity. According to reports by The New Republic,
this revocation includes the immediate elimination of DEI initiatives, with Department of Labor
employees tasked with enforcing these policies reportedly placed on paid leave.
What the Revoked Employment Act Entails
The revocation of Executive Order 11246 means that federal agencies are no longer required to maintain DEI programs that actively promote diversity and protect against discrimination. Proponents of the revocation argue that DEI programs have become “radical and wasteful,” imposing unnecessary burdens on employers and fostering reverse discrimination. By removing these requirements, the administration aims to return to a merit-based system where hiring and promotions are based solely on qualifications and performance, without consideration of race, gender, or other identity factors.
Supporters, including many Republicans, believe that DEI programs can lead to preferential treatment and undermine the principle of equal opportunity. They contend that eliminating these programs will reduce government intervention in the private sector, promote fairness, and ensure that all employees are evaluated based on their abilities and achievements rather than their demographic characteristics.
Critics Raise Alarm Over Workplace Protections
However, the revocation has been met with fierce opposition from various quarters, particularly among Democrats, civil rights advocates, and many in the business community who see DEI programs as essential for creating equitable workplaces. Critics argue that dismantling these protections will reverse decades of progress in combating workplace discrimination and marginalization.
